CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
“风景园林,不只是一本期刊。”

生态文明时代“花园城市”的价值及其评价

Value and Evaluation of “Garden City” in the Era of Ecological Civilization

  • 摘要:
    目的 “花园城市”是生态文明体制下北京城市高质量发展的重要实践目标,其规划建设需要探索适宜的评价体系做支撑。
    方法 从历史维度定位花园城市的未来价值,把握城市-自然相关指标体系的迭代过程和演变趋势,进而结合北京城市规划管理需求,探讨花园城市指标体系构建的思路和特征。
    结果 北京花园城市指标体系凸显自然提升人民福祉的花园城市未来价值,共涵盖29项评估指标,从提升自然空间的生境质量、彰显山水意境的首都气象、提供绿色生态的游憩体验、创造全民共享的绿色空间、增强气候适应的城市韧性、建设三生融汇的城市场景6个方面将北京“花园城市”的未来价值具体化。
    结论 该指标体系顺应国际趋势,将城市人与自然的交互关系作为评估核心,并充分结合北京的实际情况,具有突出价值引领、便利评估管理、体现首都特色、强调人民共享、重视体验可感等特征。该体系发布于《北京花园城市专项规划(2023年—2035年)》有利于支撑生态文明体制下的“花园城市”的规划建设与发展。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective As the national capital and a megacity, Beijing urgently needs to explore new pathways for harmonious coexistence between humans and nature to achieve high-quality development. Against this backdrop, advancing the “Garden City" initiative has become a critical strategic task. To translate the goals of Garden City development into actionable and measurable practices, establishing a scientific and context-appropriate evaluation framework is imperative as fundamental support. Currently, there is a lack of specialized systematic assessment tools for evaluating “Garden City” initiatives. This gap hinders the ability to effectively guide implementation, monitor progress, and precisely quantify nature’s contribution to public well-being. Therefore, the core objective of this research is to develop a dedicated indicator system for Beijing’s “Garden City” development, and establish a set of quantifiable indicators integrating critical dimensions.
    Methods This research positions the future value of the Garden City from a historical perspective. By reviewing the evolution of relevant indicator systems, it identifies the iterative process and development trends of urban-nature indicator systems. Subsequently, the research combines the needs of Beijing’s urban planning and management to discuss the approach and characteristics of constructing Beijing’s “Garden City Indicator System”.
    Results Since the 1990s, urban-nature evaluation frameworks and indicators have continuously evolved, playing an increasingly significant role in optimizing urban natural systems and advancing sustainable development. Globally, there is growing emphasis on promoting urban-nature assessment systems, with urban biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people becoming critical dimensions for measuring future urban progress. Reviewing the evolution of specific indicators within these frameworks reveals that the focus on urban-nature relationships has shifted: from emphasizing green quantity to quality; from concentrating on ecosystem services to caring about nature’s contribution to human’s well-being; and from objective indicators for quantitative evaluation to indicators that valuing residents’ actual experiences and perceptions. There is a growing emphasis on assessing the interactions between urban residents and nature. These trends, particularly the focus on natural well-being and human-centered considerations, align with the future value of the Garden City. The key challenges that require further innovation and exploration in establishing the evaluation system for Beijing’s Garden City include how to more systematically highlight this future value of the Garden City while building on these trends, how to showcase Beijing’s unique characteristics, and how to ensure the system aligns with practical management needs. In 2024, Beijing formulated the “Beijing Garden City Special Plan (2023-2035)”, which includes the Beijing’s “Garden City Indicator System” constructed by this research. The indicator system highlights the Garden City’s core future value of “nature enhancing public well-being” and encompasses 29 evaluation indicators. It concretizes Beijing’s “Garden City” future value across six aspects: enhancing habitat quality in natural spaces, highlighting the capital’s landscape artistry, providing green ecological recreational experiences, creating publicly shared green spaces, strengthening climate-resilient urban adaptability, and fostering integrated production-living-ecological urban scenarios.
    Conclusion Beijing’s “Garden City Indicator System” aligns with international trends by centering assessments on urban human-nature interactions, and fully integrates Beijing’s specific conditions, which characterized by a strong value orientation, ease of assessment and management, reflection of the capital’s distinctive features, emphasis on shared benefits for all citizens, and a focus on tangible experiences. This system will support the planning, construction, and development of the “Garden City” under the ecological civilization framework. Future development of Beijing’s Garden City should be grounded in the core value of “nature enhancing public well-being.” Building upon current foundations, it must iteratively advance urban-nature relationships and leverage the indicator system to promote symbiotic development. Critical focus areas include urban biodiversity conservation, presentation of mountain-water cultural heritage, enhancement of residents’ recreational experiences, public participation in shared governance, climate adaptation through Nature-based Solutions and integration of natural elements with urban renewal scenarios. Compared to global explorations during the 20th-century industrial civilization era, China’s ecological civilization system provides stronger institutional support for Garden City development. This framework holds significant potential to renew urban-nature symbiotic relationships and contribute innovative models to global practices.

     

/

返回文章
返回