CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
“风景园林,不只是一本期刊。”

人因导向下的街道空间关键要素阈值测定——基于虚拟现实和可穿戴生理传感器的循证研究

Threshold Determination of Key Street Space Elements under Human-Factor Guidance: An Evidence-Based Research Using Virtual Reality and Wearable Biosensors

  • 摘要:
    目的 在城市建设存量优化的背景下,街道空间品质提升成为城市提质增效的重要抓手。支持人本尺度的精细化设计与精细管理,开展街道空间关键要素品质效应区间的实证研究,推动街道空间设计从经验驱动向循证设计转型。
    方法 基于国内外学者经典研究、现行导则和规范,明确了街道空间设计中的4类典型街道类型、2种道路等级及4项关键空间要素,并提取其对应的指导区间。以8条典型街道为空间原型,根据要素梯度分布构建251个虚拟现实场景,并招募185名被试者进行主观偏好和生理监测相结合的具身循证感知实验。通过心理数据初步收缩现行导则中关键要素的阈值区间,为后续生理数据中异常值剔除提供参考;进一步运用窗口式变点检测算法(window-based change point detection)处理生理数据,精细化测定关键要素的阈值区间。
    结果 分析结果表明:1)在心理评价维度,人行道宽度、设施带宽度值区间呈现“适中效应”,而界面通透性与感知评价正相关;2)在生理测度维度,不同类型街道的人行道宽度阈值区间差值最小,而商业型街道对设施带宽度和界面通透性需求较高;3)生理监测数据可精细化界定并补充现有导则中要素的指导区间范围,阈值范围收缩幅度可达20%~80%。
    结论 搭建了一套可操作、易推广的街道空间要素阈值区间精细化分析框架,实现了虚拟现实、可穿戴生理传感器技术与设计实践需求的有效对接,探索了街道空间品质提升研究的新路径。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Under the background of the optimization of urban construction stock, the improvement of street space quality has become an important leverage for urban quality and efficiency enhancement. Although the importance of human-centered street space quality enhancement has been widely recognized at theoretical and cognitive levels, there is still a lack of practical guidance and operational frameworks in actual design practice. Existing research mainly focuses on measuring street space elements and analyzing their influence weights, but still lacks the refined determination of the optimal threshold intervals for street space indicators. This gap makes it difficult to translate theoretical findings into specific spatial design standards and interventions. Additionally, current guidelines provide limited guidance on street space elements, with broad or missing element intervals and insufficient support from evidence-based practice. Therefore, this research, rooted in human perception, employs VR and wearable biosensors for embodied perception experiments to refine the threshold intervals of street space elements, thus enabling more precise and operational improvements in street space quality.
    Methods In this research, based on classical research and current guidelines, 4 functional types, 2 classification levels, 4 key elements, and their corresponding guidance thresholds for street spaces are identified. Then, 8 typical streets are used as spatial prototypes, and 251 virtual reality scenes are constructed based on the threshold of each key element, 185 participants are recruited to conduct an embodied, evidence-based perception experiment integrating subjective preferences and wearable biosensors. Based on measurement data, the analysis begins with assessing psychological comfort of key street space elements using a grouped scatter plot from ChiPlot. This helps to verify the validity of the experimental data and optimize the empirical guidance intervals in the current guidelines, providing a reference for eliminating physiological data outliers and determining effective physiological threshold intervals. Then, the window-based change point detection algorithm is used to process the physiological data, and the threshold intervals of the key elements of different types of street spaces are further determined. Finally, the physiological threshold intervals are compared with the guidance intervals to evaluate the influence of physiological data on the refinement of threshold interval.
    Results In psychological dimension, different street types have similar comfort intervals in terms of interface permeability and utility area width, and sidewalk width threshold exhibits “moderate effect”. Physiological analysis shows that sidewalk width threshold is not significantly affected by cycle parking, and the difference is between 0.6 − 1.2 m for most street types. The sidewalk width interval in traffic streets is significantly affected by road grade, with the main road ranging from 4.2 m to 5.1 m and the secondary road ranging from 2.4 m to 3.2 m. Participants have a higher demand for sidewalk width and interface permeability on main road in commercial streets. People generally feel more comfortable when the utility area width is between 3.7 m and 4.1 m, and interface permeability is between 74% and 86%. Finally, through the embodied evidence-based perception experiment, the research reveals that the quantitative results of physiological data are highly consistent with the participants’ subjective perception. Furthermore, physiological data can refine and supplement the guidance thresholds for elements in the current guidelines, with the threshold range contraction reaching 20% − 80%.
    Conclusion This research proposes a systematic framework for analyzing the threshold interval of street space elements. Compared to previous analyses, this method refines the quality utility intervals of street space elements, breaking through the inherent paradigm of traditional research which is limited to the perception comfort measurement of street space quality. Additionally, this research combines virtual reality and wearable biosensor technologies to establish a comprehensive and easily applicable measurement framework. With this method, the rapid refinement of measurements for existing representative street types and the threshold intervals of spatial elements is achieved. This research also formulates specific design strategies and index recommendations from a quantitative perspective, thereby providing scientific basis and practical support for the accurate improvement of the built environment quality and design guidance and control.

     

/

返回文章
返回