CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
“风景园林,不只是一本期刊。”

京津冀地区不同功能分区植被覆盖度变化对生态系统服务影响的阈值研究

Threshold Effects of Fractional Vegetation Cover on Ecosystem Service Across Different Functional Zones in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China

  • 摘要:
    目的 京津冀地区生态系统组成存在显著的空间异质性,各功能分区植被覆盖度(fractional vegetation cover, FVC)变化对生态系统服务(ecosystem service, ES)的影响阈值尚不明确,尤其是在不同功能分区之间是否存在差异化阈值效应,缺乏定量识别。
    方法 以京津冀地区(西北部生态涵养区、中部核心功能区、南部功能拓展区、东部滨海发展区)4个功能分区为研究区,以2000—2020年为研究时段,利用生态系统服务评估模型评估不同功能分区生态系统服务;基于归一化植被指数(normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI)估算FVC,进而通过弹性分析等方法,识别不同功能分区FVC促进生态系统服务提升的阈值。
    结果 2000—2020年,京津冀地区各功能分区产水量、固碳服务和土壤保持整体呈上升趋势,而生境质量仅在东部滨海发展区得到改善,在其他功能分区均下降。FVC对生态系统服务的影响存在阈值效应,各功能分区FVC阈值分别为西北部生态涵养区0.946、中部核心功能区0.824、南部功能拓展区0.772和东部滨海发展区0.775。
    结论 本研究揭示了京津冀地区各功能分区FVC对生态系统服务的影响存在阈值效应,且阈值具有显著的空间异质性,为理解京津冀地区FVC与生态系统服务的动态关系提供了新视角,可为京津冀地区生态系统精准化管理及生态产品价值实现提供量化依据与科学支撑。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The interplay of natural and anthropogenic factors has led to significant spatial heterogeneity in vegetation distribution across the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Vegetation conditions are a critical determinant of regional ecosystem service (ES) and functioning. Nevertheless, the threshold effects of vegetation changes on ecosystem services across different functional zones remain unclear, and whether such thresholds vary spatially lacks quantitative identification. This study aims to systematically analyze the spatiotemporal dynamics of fractional vegetation cover (FVC) and key ES in various functional zones (the northwestern ecological conservation zone, central core functional zone, southern functional expansion zone, and eastern coastal development zone) from 2000 to 2020, and to quantify the threshold effects of FVC on ES.
    Methods Based on data availability and assessment feasibility, this study focused on the importance of ecological security in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its correlation with vegetation changes, and selected four key ecosystem services: habitat quality, water yield, soil conservation, and carbon sequestration. The specific methods were as follows. First, the habitat quality and water yield modules of the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and trade-offs (InVEST) model were utilized to assess habitat quality and water yield; the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) model was used to assess soil conservation services, and the Carnegie-Ames-Stanford approach (CASA) model was used to assess carbon sequestration services across different functional zones of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Second, FVC in each functional zone was estimated based on NDVI data. Subsequently, the biophysical values of the four ecosystem services were normalized into dimensionless values, which were then summed to obtain the total ecosystem service (TES), representing the overall level of ES in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Finally, a combination of the quantile segmentation method and elasticity coefficient was applied to identify the FVC thresholds that influence TES across different functional zones.
    Results The spatiotemporal dynamics of ES in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region was significant from 2000 to 2020. From the perspective of functional zones, habitat quality decreased by 2.98% in the northwestern ecological conservation zone, by 11.32% in the central core functional zone, and by 8.14% in the southern functional expansion zone. Notably, habitat quality in the eastern coastal development zone showed an increasing trend during this period, with an increase of 10.62%. Soil conservation increased most significantly in the eastern coastal development zone, rising by 91.84%. It also increased in the northwestern ecological conservation zone (61.01%), the central core functional zone (55.22%), and the southern functional expansion zone (28.63%). Regarding water yield, the eastern coastal development zone exhibited the largest increase (132.13%), followed by the northwestern ecological conservation zone (127.36%), the central core functional zone (119.40%), and the southern functional expansion zone (43.19%). In terms of carbon sequestration, the northwestern ecological conservation zone and the southern functional expansion zone showed the most substantial increases, with rises of 65.46% and 65.99%, respectively, while the central core functional zone and the eastern coastal development zone increased by 1.26% and 24.12%, respectively. FVC showed an overall increasing trend. By functional zone, the northwestern ecological conservation zone exhibited a relatively pronounced increase (14.60%), followed by the eastern coastal development zone (2.66%), the central core functional zone (1.49%), and the southern functional expansion zone (0.37%). Furthermore, this study elucidated the differentiated impacts and thresholds of FVC on ES across functional zones. The thresholds, in descending order, were: northwestern ecological conservation zone (0.946), central core functional zone (0.824), eastern coastal development zone (0.775), and southern functional expansion zone (0.772).
    Conclusion This study shows that the effects of FVC on ES in different functional zones exhibit regional threshold characteristics. Accordingly, differentiated ecosystem management pathways were proposed based on the ecological conditions and FVC threshold characteristics of each functional zone. For the northwestern ecological conservation zone, which has an overall high FVC, management priorities should shift from quantity expansion to quality improvement. The central core functional zone should focus on the comprehensive enhancement of ecosystem quality rather than merely increasing vegetation area, promoting ES improvements within limited spaces through optimized urban green space landscape patterns. For the southern functional expansion zone dominated by agricultural ecosystems, efforts should enhance the multifunctionality of agricultural ecosystems, scientifically regulate FVC in agricultural systems, and promote water-saving irrigation and ecological agriculture to synergistically improve provisioning ES alongside biodiversity and hydrological regulation functions. The eastern coastal development zone requires the synchronised improvement of vegetation quality and stress resistance, avoiding monoculture vegetation planting, emphasizing saline-alkali tolerance, and constructing structurally stable and functionally diverse ecosystems. These findings provide scientific support for precision ecosystem management and the realization of ecological product value and sustainable development in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region.

     

/

返回文章
返回