CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
“风景园林,不只是一本期刊。”
(日)青木信夫, 徐苏斌. 中日工业遗产调查与评估研究的比较与借鉴[J]. 风景园林, 2022, 29(4): 40-46. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.04.0040.07
引用本文: (日)青木信夫, 徐苏斌. 中日工业遗产调查与评估研究的比较与借鉴[J]. 风景园林, 2022, 29(4): 40-46. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.04.0040.07
(JPN) AOKI Nobuo, XU Subin. Comparison and Reference of Industrial Heritage Survey and Evaluation Researches in China and Japan[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(4): 40-46. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.04.0040.07
Citation: (JPN) AOKI Nobuo, XU Subin. Comparison and Reference of Industrial Heritage Survey and Evaluation Researches in China and Japan[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(4): 40-46. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.04.0040.07

中日工业遗产调查与评估研究的比较与借鉴

Comparison and Reference of Industrial Heritage Survey and Evaluation Researches in China and Japan

  • 摘要: 亚洲的近代工业受到英国工业革命的巨大影响,亚洲的工业遗产研究和保护也是在国际工业遗产保护的背景下发展起来的。日本产业遗产研究始于20世纪70年代,中国的工业遗产研究自2006年呈现出明显的上升趋势,至今仍然正在推进中。中日的工业遗产研究和保护有着不同的特色,采取中日比较的方法探究两国工业遗产在研究和发展历程、调查和评估方法、文物指定情况等方面的异同,考察国际工业遗产保护在亚洲的发展,同时加强亚洲工业遗产研究的学术交流和互相借鉴。提出如下建议:1)基础研究依然是下个阶段中国工业遗产研究的重要任务;2)应该尽快推进全国的普查;3)中国的数据库建设和评估工作有待进一步深入。

     

    Abstract: Modern industries in Asia were greatly influenced by the British Industrial Revolution, and the researches and protection of Asian industrial heritage also developed in the context of international industrial heritage protection. Japan’s industrial heritage researches began in the 1970s. China’s industrial heritage researches showed a clear upward trend in 2006 and is still in progress today. The researches and protection of industrial heritage in China and Japan have different characteristics. This article compares the similarities and differences in the research and development histories, survey and evaluation methods, and cultural relic designation between the two countries in order to examine the development of international industrial heritage protection in Asia from the case of Japan and China and strengthens academic exchanges and mutual learning of Asian industrial heritage. The author believes that: 1) basic research remains an important task for the next stage of China’s industrial heritage research in the next stage. 2) The nationwide census should be carried out as soon as possible. 3) China’s database construction and evaluation should be further deepened.

     

/

返回文章
返回