CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
“风景园林,不只是一本期刊。”
杨叠川,高翅.解析欧洲多尺度风景特质识别的5项议题[J].风景园林,2024,31(1):14-22.
引用本文: 杨叠川,高翅.解析欧洲多尺度风景特质识别的5项议题[J].风景园林,2024,31(1):14-22.
YANG D C, GAO C. Analysis of Five Topics in Multi-Scale Identification of Landscape Characters in Europe[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(1): 14-22.
Citation: YANG D C, GAO C. Analysis of Five Topics in Multi-Scale Identification of Landscape Characters in Europe[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(1): 14-22.

解析欧洲多尺度风景特质识别的5项议题

Analysis of Five Topics in Multi-Scale Identification of Landscape Characters in Europe

  • 摘要:
    目的 风景特质识别是进行全域风景保护、规划与管理的基础性工作之一,具有综合主观判断与客观属性的特点。系统梳理欧洲多尺度识别中定性与定量、主观与客观之间的关系,对中国全域风景特质的识别具有借鉴意义。
    方法 通过文献归纳与演绎,分析风景特质定义引申出的识别主体、要素类别、感知方式、识别方法、图解形式5项议题。
    结果 阐述了多尺度风景特质的层级特征,总结了宏观到微观尺度下移过程中5项议题的变化模式:识别主体由专家转向公众转变;要素类别由自然向文化转变;感知方式由间接向直接转变;识别方法由数字向人工转变;图解形式由科学性向科普性转变。归纳了多尺度识别的公式化表达。
    结论 以尺度作为转变载体,解析了综合主观性和客观性的多尺度风景特质识别的基本路径,为全域风景的多样性、连续性和地域性保护、规划与管理提供帮助。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In the context of rapid globalization and urbanization, the decline of landscape has continued to capture attention worldwide while landscapes are losing their diversity, continuity and locality characters. How to protect, plan and manage landscape in a systematic way has become a constant issue. Landscape character has been defined as “a distinct, recognizable and consistent pattern of landscape elements that makes one landscape different from another, rather than better or worse”. As an effective tool for understanding the connotation of landscape, managing landscape change, and identifying landscape value, landscape character assessment (LCA) has been researched and carried out worldwide. Featuring the combination of subjectivity and objectivity, landscape characterization is one of the fundamental tasks in carrying out territorial landscape protection, planning and management. Most of the existing LCA researches focus on the identification stage for it is a prerequisite for assessment. More importantly, the connotations of LCA and the “Europe Landscape Convention” (ELC) pose challenges for synthesizing the relationship between qualitativeness and quantitativeness, and between subjectivity and objectivity in identification. This research aims to systematically sort out the relationship between qualitativeness and quantitativeness, and between subjectivity and objectivity in multi-scale identification, and to provide reference for whole area identification of landscape characters in China in the context of territorial spatial planning.
    Methods Based on literature induction and deduction, this research derives from the definition of landscape character in Europe five core questions with respect to the identification of landscape character: 1) Who identifies landscape character; 2) what are the elements included in landscape character; 3) how to perceive landscape character; 4) how to identify landscape character; and 5) how to express landscape character. On this basis, the research analyzes relevant cases of landscape character identification by induction and deduction, and takes scale variation as the carrier integrating subjective and objective attributes of landscape character and subjective judgments in landscape character identification.
    Results This research summarizes the relationship between ELC and LCA. The concept of landscape character has an impact on the definition of ELC. As the first international treaty dedicated to landscape, ELC explicitly used the word “character” in its definition of “landscape”, marking the initial official introduction of “character” in European governmental laws and regulations. Meanwhile, ELC has contributed to the comprehensive development of landscape character research. ELC is a key for cross-border and cross-disciplinary communication on landscape issues among EU member states at the legal and regulatory levels, and serves as the basis for the continuous development of European landscape character assessment. In addition, this research also systematically analyzes five topics related to the definition and identification of landscape character, including participant identification, element composition, cognition mode, identification method, and graphic form. Furthermore, the research analyzes the hierarchical features of multi-scale landscape character identification, including both scale size and downscaling. The downscaling process is also the process of interchanging landscape character types and landscape character areas, but it does not only refer to the process of shifting from abstractness to concreteness and from coarser resolution to more detailed resolution. The process of downscaling is accompanied by a change of concerns such as elements, participants, and methods adopted. From the downscaling perspective, different concerns of the above five topics can be synthesized. As a result, this research summarizes the patterns of changes in five topics during the transition from macro to micro scales: the shift in identification participants from experts to the general public; the shift of cognition modes from indirect cognition to direct cognition; the shift in element composition from natural factors to cultural factors; the shift in identification methods from digital division to human interpretation; and the shift of graphic forms from scientific graphic to science popularization graphic. The key difficulties and priorities of each topic are also explained.Drawing on the European Landscape Character Assessment Initiative (ELCAI), this research clarifies the basic framework of landscape characterization in a formulaic language to serve multi-scale landscape characterization tasks in a more holistic and clear way. The idea of multi-scale landscape identification can be succinctly expressed by the following equation: Characterization = f (P(t), F(t), C(t), M(t), G(t)). The equation has six independent variables of P, F, C, M, G, and t, respectively indicating identification participant, factor category, cognition mode, identification method, graphic mode, and time depth.
    Conclusion As to the relationship between man and nature, Chinese philosophy has been emphasizing the “unity of man and nature”. In the current Anthropocene stage, the Eastern and Western views of landscape concept have moved from conceptual division to integration, and this unification of landscape epistemology is the basis for the research of landscape character theory in China. Nowadays, the significance of effective protection and management of regional traditional landscape has been widely recognized worldwide, and the evolution of landscape degradation brought about by globalization and rapid urbanization has become a common challenge faced by all countries. In addition to innovative ideas for the protection, planning and management of territorial landscape, ELC and LCA have also brought about the challenge of systematically identifying and assessing landscape. Taking scale as the carrier for shifting, this research systematically analyzes the objectivity and subjectivity of landscape character identification, with a view to contributing to the protection and management of the diversity, continuity, and locality characters of territorial landscape in the context of China’s territorial spatial planning.

     

/

返回文章
返回