CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
"Landscape Architecture is more than a journal."
  • WeChat Subscription <br/>Account
  • Core Journal of China
  • Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations
LIN Zhishan, LIN Guangsi. Research Status and Prospects of Child-Friendly Open Spaces Based on Affordance Theory[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(2): 71-77. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.02.0071.07
Citation: LIN Zhishan, LIN Guangsi. Research Status and Prospects of Child-Friendly Open Spaces Based on Affordance Theory[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(2): 71-77. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.02.0071.07

Research Status and Prospects of Child-Friendly Open Spaces Based on Affordance Theory

More Information
  • Published Date: February 09, 2022
  • The affordance theory describes the psychological essence of children's environmental perception and their behavioral response to specific environment in the way of function, reflecting strong humanistic care. Through literature review, this paper first clarifies that the affordance theory has become an important basis for the research of children's environmental perception because it can directly describe children's environment-behavior relationship. By different dimensions, levels and attributes of affordance, the various activities opportunities provided by open spaces for children can be described in detail. As a medium concept to connect environment with human perception and behavior, affordance actually describes conditions of behavior occurrence and explains how physical, social and cultural and individual factors affect children's realization of affordances and even children's development. Measuring and analyzing affordance constitutes the basic research method of child-friendly open spaces based on affordance theory at present. The research of child-friendly open spaces based on affordance theory also goes beyond the space design decision and efficiency evaluation and further provides the possibility of establishing a research and practice framework oriented by evidence-based design.
  • Related Articles

    [1]公共交往与艺术校园——中央美术学院燕郊校区校园景观更新环境设计[J]. Landscape Architecture. DOI: 10.3724/j.fjyl.LA20240176
    [2]LIU Xuan, WANG Siyuan. Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Space Based on Participatory Geographic Information System (PGIS): A Case Study of the Core Area of Beijing[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(7): 131-136. DOI: 10.3724/j.fjyl.202307100311
    [3]GBR) Woolley Helen, (GBR) Somerset-Ward Alison, (GBR) Bradshaw Kate, TANG Pai. “Living with Nature”: Improving Urban Green Spaces for Children’s Play[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(2): 84-97. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.02.0084.14
    [4]ZHAO Di, BI Yiran. Research Progress and Prospect of Children’s Participatory Planning and Design in Urban Construction[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(2): 65-70. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.02.0065.06
    [5]ZHANG Jingyuan, LIU Kun. Dilemma and Symbiosis: Reviewing the Strategies of Wildlife-Inclusive Urban Design and Its Insights for Applications[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(1): 18-25. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.01.0018.08
    [6]LU Xi, (DEU) Eckart Lange. Stakeholder Characteristics and Interactions in a Participatory Community Renewal Project: A Case Study of Pun Tong Wuyue Village, Guangzhou[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(9): 24-30. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.09.0024.07
    [7]ZHOU Zhaosen, LIN Guangsi. Research on the Theory of Inclusive Design for Urban Parks Resisting Design Exclusion[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(5): 36-41. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.05.0036.06
    [8]ZHANG Tianjie, YUE Yang. Collaboration and Inclusion: Studies on the Community in Bloom Programme in Singapore[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26(6): 29-34.
    [9]LIU Yuelai, XU Junli, YIN Keluan. Participatory Construction of Community Public Space in High-density Cities ——A Case Study of Community Gardens[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26(6): 13-17.
    [10]ZHENG Xiao-di, XU Ju-jie, WANG Liu-xin. Student Participatory Campus Landscape Design and Research[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2018, 25(3): 32-37.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 王微,陈烨,吴雪晴,章颖. 基于CiteSpace的景观绩效研究概述与发展. 建筑与文化. 2025(01): 120-122 .
    2. 刘堃,曾志涵,张昌娟. 基于布勒比模型的儿童友好城市环境评价与解析——以深圳市典型城区为例. 中国园林. 2025(02): 70-77 .
    3. 白洁,张文正,徐美红,许涛,王苗. 以自然体验为导向的儿童友好活动空间循证设计. 中国城市林业. 2025(01): 111-118 .
    4. 陈煊,张曦元,杨婕,吴英豪. 基于环境可供性理论的儿童友好型城市公园设计策略——以长沙市咸嘉湖公园为例. 城市环境设计. 2024(04): 186-189 .
    5. 韩涵,于冰沁. “一米高度看城市”:儿童友好视角下的综合公园趣味性评价. 南方建筑. 2023(05): 99-107 .
    6. 郭菂,石一杉,王正. 儿童友好城市社区街道空间的“供”与“需”. 城市观察. 2023(03): 94-109+162 .
    7. 吴楠清,陶婵. 可供性视角下儿童户外游戏空间研究现状. 湖南包装. 2023(05): 123-127 .
    8. Di Guo,Yishan Shi,Ruiqi Chen. Environmental affordances and children's needs:Insights from child-friendly community streets in China. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2023(03): 411-422 .
    9. 陈琳. 基于环境可供性的乡村公共空间景观优化研究——以朱桥村为例. 现代园艺. 2022(09): 109-112 .
    10. 刘伊航,宋莎莎. 基于可供性的家具材料CMF应用设计研究. 包装工程. 2022(18): 80-86 .
    11. 周兆森,林广思. 基于扎根理论的城市公园游憩者包容性感知及影响因素研究. 景观设计学(中英文). 2022(03): 12-37 .
    12. 田靖雯,张秦英,李佳滢,张博伦. 天津市社区公园儿童与植物交互的自发游戏及环境特征研究. 景观设计学(中英文). 2022(03): 38-65 .

    Other cited types(37)

Catalog

    Article views (916) PDF downloads (229) Cited by(49)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return