CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
"Landscape Architecture is more than a journal."
  • WeChat Subscription <br/>Account
  • Core Journal of China
  • Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations
LIU C H, XIE M K, MENG S Y, ZHANG C Y, ZHANG Y L. International Experience and Implication of the Full-Process Practice of Opening and Sharing in Megacity Parks[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(2): 41-47.
Citation: LIU C H, XIE M K, MENG S Y, ZHANG C Y, ZHANG Y L. International Experience and Implication of the Full-Process Practice of Opening and Sharing in Megacity Parks[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(2): 41-47.

International Experience and Implication of the Full-Process Practice of Opening and Sharing in Megacity Parks

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    LIU Chenhui is a master student in the School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University. Her research focuses on landscape planning and design

    XIE Minke is an undergraduate student in the School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University. Her research focuses on landscape planning and design

    MENG Shiyu is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University. His research focuses on landscape planning and design

    ZHANG Chaoyu is a master student in the School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University. Her research focuses on landscape planning and design

    ZHANG Yunlu, Ph.D., is a professor in the School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, deputy director of the Office of the National Landscape Architecture Professional Degree Postgraduate Education Steering Committee, a member of Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, and a young editorial board member of this journal. His research focuses on theory and practice of landscape planning and design, and urban rural green space system planning

  • Corresponding author:

    ZHANG Yunlu, zhangyunlu1986829@163.com

  • Received Date: October 12, 2023
  • Revised Date: January 04, 2024
  • Available Online: January 10, 2024
  • Issue Publish Date: February 09, 2024
  • Objective 

    Megacities are generally characterized by serious urban scale expansion and dense population, which has resulted in increasingly prominent problems such as insufficient green space and uneven spatial distribution. In order to better solve these problems, at the beginning of 2023, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development issued the Notice on the Pilot Work of Opening and Sharing of Urban Parks and Green Spaces, which encourages localities to break new ground in the opening and sharing of parks and green spaces in a pilot manner, so as to meet the new needs and expectations of the people in the new era. Since then, all parts of the country have begun to open and share urban parks and green spaces. However, currently, such opening and sharing in China is still in the stage of free exploration without sufficient theoretical research or practical experience. As a benchmark for other large, medium and small cities, megacities are of great practical significance in exploring new paths for opening and sharing parks and green spaces in a balanced, efficient and scientific way, in order to enhance the multiple service functions of parks and satisfy the people’s aspirations for a better life. Therefore, it is urgent to think about how to realize the long-term development of innovative means and implementation paths for the opening and sharing of parks and green spaces in megacities.

    Methods/process 

    Megacities, as a higher-order form of urban development, have the most excellent allocation of resources for parks and green spaces, while also facing greater construction pressure and severe problems than small cities, such as uneven distribution of green space resources and limitation of park service scope. By sorting out the current implementation of park opening and sharing in megacities and analyzing the deep-rooted internal reasons, which are crucial for promoting the pilot opening and sharing of parks in the future, this research summarizes the following four problems. 1) Green space layout problem: Uneven distribution of green space for the implementation of park opening and sharing in megacities. 2) Green space utilization problem: The open and shared park green spaces in megacities are inefficiently utilized. 3) Green space operation and maintenance problem: The open and shared park operation mode of megacities keeps to the beaten track. 4) Green space management problem: The park management system of megacities is inefficient, random and extensive. In such egacities as Singapore, London, Tokyo and New York , the research and practice of park opening and sharing have been carried out for a relatively long period of time, gradually giving birth to a perfect top-level design approach, an efficient and feasible planning system, a multi-party operation mode, and a scientific and reasonable later-stage management and operation mechanism in the specific implementation of park opening and sharing, which can provide certain inspirations for the opening and sharing of China’s parks. By analyzing the practice of park opening and sharing in the four international megacities in combination with relevant policy and legislation, planning idea, operation system and management mode, the research systematically summarizes the characteristic highlights and successful experience in park opening and sharing of the megacities from the following four aspects, respectively. 1) Inspiration from Singapore’s experience: Strengthen top-level design and insist on government leadership. 2) Inspiration from London’s experience: Prepose grading and classification under the guidance of macro-planning. 3) Inspiration from Tokyo’s experience: Clarify park operators and diversify participants. 4) Inspiration from New York’s experience: Ensure flexible management and maintenance, and rational utilization of resources.

    Results/conclusion 

    This research systematically sorts out the development paths of parks in foreign megacities to realize high-quality opening and sharing, summarizes their characteristic highlights and successful experiences in park renewal and reconstruction, and puts forward the opening and sharing model of parks and green spaces in China’s megacities that is oriented by realistic problems, guaranteed by policies and regulations, guided by macro-planning, and based on fine management, so as to promote the standardization, scientification, and rationalization of the opening and sharing of urban parks and green spaces, and provide certain reference for deepening park opening and sharing in the future. Moreover, the research also provides some reference suggestions for the implementation of park opening and sharing in China from the following four aspects, respectively. 1) Improve the policies and regulations on park opening and sharing, and strengthen the governmental top-level design. 2) Regulate the layout of green space under the guidance of macro-planning, and build a hierarchical classification system following the principle of preposition. 3) Attract social organizations to highly participate in park operation, and establish an efficient multi-party cooperation mechanism. 4) Improve the long-term mechanism of park management, and strengthen the ability of fine management. The park opening and sharing work of China is a concrete implementation and embodiment of the “people-centered” development concept, well responding to the people’s urgent demand for urban green public space. In the future, the opening and sharing of urban parks in China will make steady progress and achieve long-term development.

  • [1]
    新华社.深入学习贯彻党的十九届四中全会精神提高社会主义现代化国际大都市治理能力和水平[N].人民日报, 2019-11-04(1).

    Xinhua News Agency.In-depth Study and Implementation of the Spirit of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee to Improve the Governance Capacity and Level of Socialist Modernized International Metropolis[N]. People’s Daily, 2019-11-04(1).
    [2]
    住房和城乡建设部办公厅.住房和城乡建设部办公厅关于开展城市公园绿地开放共享试点工作的通知[EB/OL].(2023-1-31)[2023-12-10]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2023-02/06/content_5740376.htm.

    Office of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. Notice of the Office of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development on the Pilot Work of Opening and Sharing of Urban Parks and Green Spaces[EB/OL]. (2023-1-31) [2023-12-10]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2023-02/06/content_5740376.htm.
    [3]
    刘理晖,顾天安,孙轩,等.论超大城市治理体系与治理能力现代化建设[J].科学发展,2021(7):71-79.

    LIU L H, GU T A, SUN X, et al. On the Modernization of Governance System and Capacity of Mega Cities[J]. Scientific Development, 2021 (7): 71-79.
    [4]
    陈水生.超大城市空间的统合治理:基于北京“疏解整治促提升”专项行动的分析与反思[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2019(4):67-76.

    CHEN S S. Integrated Governance of Megacity Space: Analysis and Reflection on the Special Action of “Dredging, Rectification and Promoting Promotion” in Beijing[J]. Journal of Gansu Administration Institute, 2019 (4): 67-76.
    [5]
    李盈秀.基于分形理论的大城市公园绿地空间布局合理性评价方法研究[D].重庆: 重庆大学, 2019.

    LI Y X. Research on the Evaluation Method of Rationality of Park Green Space Layout in Big Cities Based on Fractal Theory[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2019.
    [6]
    哈思杰,肖志中,程逸,等.脱钩与否?超大城市公园绿地与建设用地关系矛盾与策略:以武汉市为例[J].武汉社会科学,2022(3):122-127.

    HA S J, XIAO Z Z, CHENG Y, et al. Decoupling or Not? Conflicts and Strategies of the Relationship Between Park Green Space and Building Land in Mega Cities: Taking Wuhan as an Example[J]. Social Sciences in Wuhan, 2022 (3): 122-127.
    [7]
    苏婷婷,李欢,马嘉,等.公园城市理念下的城乡公园体系构建与优化研究:基于国内外实践[J].城市发展研究,2023,30(4):37-41.

    SU T T, LI H, MA J, et al. Research on the Construction and Optimization of Park System Under the Concept of Park City: A Case Study of Liuzhou City[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2023, 30 (4): 37-41.
    [8]
    印璇,曹舒仪.公园城市建设的国际经验借鉴及启示[J].住宅与房地产,2020(5):243-244.

    YIN X, CAO S Y. International Experience in the Construction of Park Cities and Its Inspiration[J]. Housing and Real Estate, 2020 (5): 243-244.
    [9]
    尹晨冬, 朱俊华.新加坡国家公园体系规划解读及其对广州的启示[C]//中国城市规划学会, 成都市人民政府.面向高质量发展的空间治理: 2020中国城市规划年会论文集(08城市生态规划).北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2021: 8.

    YIN C D, ZHU J H. Review on Singapore National Parks Planning System and Its Implication for Guangzhou[C]// Urban Planning Society of China, Chengdu Municipal People’s Government. Spatial Governance for High-Quality Development: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Urban Planning in China 2020 (08 Urban Ecological Planning). Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2021: 8.
    [10]
    Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources. Parks and Trees Act 2005[EB/OL]. (2005-08-01) [2024-01-04]. https://sso.agc.gov.sg//Act/PTA2005
    [11]
    王君,刘宏.从“花园城市”到“花园中的城市”:新加坡环境政策的理念与实践及其对中国的启示[J].城市观察,2015(2):5-16.

    WANG J, LIU H. From “Garden City” to “City in a Garden”: the Ideals and Practices of Singapore’s Environmental Greenery Policy and Its Implications for the Chinese Government[J]. Urban Insight, 2015 (2): 5-16.
    [12]
    赵凯茜,姚朋.伦敦环城绿带规划对我国山水城市构建的启示[J].工业建筑,2020,50(4):6-9.

    ZHAO K X, YAO P. The Enlightenment of London’s Green Belt Planning to the Construction of China’s Shanshui City[J]. Industrial Construction, 2020, 50 (4): 6-9.
    [13]
    刘彦彤,彭腾,张云路.公园城市目标下城市绿地系统建设的国际经验:基于英国伦敦实践研究[J].中国园林,2021,37(8):34-38.

    LIU Y T, PENG T, ZHANG Y L. International Experience of Urban Green Space System Construction Under the Goal of Park City: Based on a Practical Study of London, UK[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2021, 37 (8): 34-38.
    [14]
    郝钰,贺旭生,刘宁京,等.城市公园体系建设与实践的国际经验:以伦敦、东京、多伦多为例[J].中国园林,2021,37(S1):34-39.

    HAO Y, HE X S, LIU N J, et al. International Experience in the Construction and Practice of Urban Park System: A Case Study of London, Tokyo and Toronto[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2021, 37 (S1): 34-39.
    [15]
    冯矛, 张涛. 构筑城乡“全域统筹—功能复合”绿色空间体系: 英国伦敦绿网战略规划案例研究[C]//中国城市规划学会, 成都市人民政府.面向高质量发展的空间治理: 2020中国城市规划年会论文集(12风景环境规划).北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2021: 9.

    FENG M, ZHANG T. Constructing an Urban and Rural Green Space System with Territorial Integration and Functional Complexity: A Case Study of Green Network Strategic Planning in London, UK[C]// China Association of City Planning, Chengdu Municipal People’s Government. Spatial Governance for High-Quality Development: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Urban Planning in China 2020 (12 Landscape Environmental Planning). Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2021: 9.
    [16]
    李玉红.日本城市公园绿地管理发展研究[J].中国园林,2009,25(10):77-81.

    LI Y H. The Study on Management Development of Japan City Parks and Open Space[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2009, 25 (10): 77-81.
    [17]
    宗敏,彭利达,孙旻恺,等.Park-PFI制度在日本都市公园建设管理中的应用:以南池袋公园为例[J].中国园林,2020,36(8):90-94.

    ZONG M, PENG L D, SUN M K, et al. Application of Park-PFI System in the Construction and Management of Japanese Urban Parks: With the Example of Minami-Ikebukuro Park[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2020, 36 (8): 90-94.
    [18]
    王铁山.PFI项目融资:英国和日本模式的比较研究[J].国际经济合作,2008(1):49-52.

    WANG T S. PFI Project Finance: A Comparative Study of the British and Japanese Models[J]. International Economic Cooperation, 2008 (1): 49-52.
    [19]
    刘源,周亘.美国纽约中央公园的营建和管理[J].陕西林业科技,2012(4):64-65.

    LIU Y, ZHOU G. The Construction and Management of Central Park in New York[J]. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 2012 (4): 64-65.
    [20]
    张燎,李文钊.智慧城市治理的美国镜鉴[J].人民论坛,2023(3):97-99.

    ZHANG L, LI W Z. A U.S. Mirror of Smart City Governance[J]. People’s Tribune, 2023 (3): 97-99.
    [21]
    左辅强.纽约中央公园适时更新与复兴的启示[J].中国园林,2005,21(7):68-71.

    ZUO F Q. Inspiration of Timely Renewal and Revitalization of New York’s Central Park[J]. China Garden, 2005, 21 (7): 68-71.
    [22]
    黄建欣.纽约市公园规划友好性建设实践经验及启示[J].城市建筑,2018(12):18-21.

    HUANG J X. New York City Park Friendly Planning Construction Practice Experience and Enlightenment[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2018 (12): 18-21.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Author: (DNK) Stig L. Andersson, Translator: JIA Lyuyuan, Proofreader: WANG Xiyue. The Necessity for a New View of Nature[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(1): 80-88. DOI: 10.3724/j.fjyl.202309080406
    [2]Vivo New Headquarters Landscape Design[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30(S1): 114-116.
    [3]Surfacedesign, Inc.. Auckland International Airport Landscape, New Zealand[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30(7): 66-72.
    [4]Yuerong Park in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(S1): 11-15.
    [5]MO Fei, XU Yue, FU Yanrong, CHE Shengquan. The Evolution of Urban Biodiversity Conservation Strategies in London from the Perspective of Blue and Green Space Management (2002–2021)[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(4): 101-106. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.04.0101.06
    [6]WANG Xinyu, LI Mengyu, LIU Yu, YAO Peng. Regional Green Space Planning Evolution in New York Metropolitan Area and Its Enlightenment (1922—2020)[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(12): 63-69. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.12.0063.07
    [7](CAN) Patrick Mooney, JIANG Bei. Garden Cities in the New Millenia[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(10): 84-95. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.10.0084.12
    [8]LAI Yuan, WANG Yu, LIN Tianyi. Urban Informatics for Green Infrastructure: An Integrated Approach for Street Trees Data Collection, Analytics, and Citizen Science in New York City[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(1): 17-30. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.01.0017.14
    [9]ZHENG Xi. Landscape Architecture in the New Public Health Era[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2020, 27(9): 6-7.
    [10]DAI Wei, SUN Yimin*, (NLD) Han Meyer. Resilience as a New Concept of Planning Transformation in Delta Areas[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26(9): 83-92. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2019.09.0083.10
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 董美君,刘静怡. 基于全龄代际共享的口袋公园更新策略研究——以上海市为例. 园林. 2025(02): 77-85 .
    2. 张赢予. 柳州市公园绿地开放共享的实践探索与思考. 现代园艺. 2025(10): 162-164 .
    3. 李书畅,张晋石,范永恒. 开放共享视角下城市综合公园质量评价与更新. 中国城市林业. 2024(03): 104-111 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (448) PDF downloads (160) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return