Theoretical Foundation and Practical Prospect for Urban Rewilding

HU Shangchun; LIU Jiahui; SU Xing; LI Baoqin

doi:10.3724/j.fjyl.202402050084

Landscape Architecture > 2024 > 31(11): 12-21. > DOI: 10.3724/j.fjyl.202402050084

HU S C, LIU J H, SU X, LI B Q. Theoretical Foundation and Practical Prospect for Urban Rewilding[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(11): 12-21.

Citation:

HU S C, LIU J H, SU X, LI B Q. Theoretical Foundation and Practical Prospect for Urban Rewilding[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(11): 12-21.

Citation:

HU S C, LIU J H, SU X, LI B Q. Theoretical Foundation and Practical Prospect for Urban Rewilding[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2024, 31(11): 12-21.

PDF (3255 KB)

Theoretical Foundation and Practical Prospect for Urban Rewilding

1.
School of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University
2.
Chongqing Institute of Landscape Architecture
3.
TEDA Landscape Architecture Planning and Design Institute

More Information

Author Bio:
HU Shangchun, Ph.D., is an associate professor in the School of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University. His research focuses on urban rewilding

LIU Jiahui is a master student in the School of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University. Her research focuses on plantscape planning and design

SU Xing, Master, is a senior engineer in Chongqing Institute of Landscape Architecture. Her research focuses on landscape planning and design

LI Baoqin, Master, is a senior engineer in TEDA Landscape Architecture Planning and Design Institute. Her research focuses on plantscape planning and design
Received Date: February 04, 2024
Revised Date: September 08, 2024
Available Online: August 29, 2024
Issue Publish Date: November 09, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
The process of urbanization and industrial development have led to the increasing deterioration of the human living environment, and made the relationship between human and wild nature increasingly alienated. Scholars in the field of ecology and environment are aware of the necessity of urban rewilding and strive to restore the connection between human and wild nature in the city. Urban rewilding is a measure to restore the natural ecological process of the urban environment to protect urban biodiversity and enhance urban residents’ daily contact with wild nature. The discussion on the theoretical foundation for urban rewilding can provide theoretical reference for future urban greening construction and management.
Methods/process
This research introduces the background and connotation of urban rewilding, summarizes relevant basic theories of urban rewilding, and explains the connections between such theories. These theories include urban ecology, rewilding, Nature-based Solutions (NbS) and biophilia, landscape ecology, biodiversity, community assembly, community succession, self-design and designer approach, invasion ecology, landscape disturbance and resilience, exposure ecology, and landscape preference theories. In order to show the organic connections between the aforesaid theories, this research sorts out these theories from the perspectives of urban ecosystem and rewilding, explains these theories from the perspectives of practice sector and elements of urban ecosystem, and analyzes and summarizes the schemes of urban rewilding and the theories corresponding to each step of the scheme. In addition, the research also explores the future research and practice directions of urban rewilding.
Results/conclusion
Through a systematic analysis of the theoretical foundation for urban rewilding, the research finds that the theories discussed are organically related rather than mechanically combined. Thus, a systematic analysis and summary of the theoretical foundation for urban rewilding is made, which provides support for the establishment of a theoretical system of urban rewilding in the future and also provides ideas for academic research and applied practice in this field. The theories above are described in detail as follows. 1) Urban ecology theory. Urban rewilding needs to be based on a clear understanding of the city. The city is a complex social-ecological system. Urban rewilding is quite different from the rewilding of natural sites. 2) Rewilding theory. It provides an important reference for the research and practice of urban rewilding. 3) NbS and biophilia theory. Being closely related to rewilding theory, these theories have a reference role in the development of urban rewilding research. 4) Landscape ecology theory. For cities with different types of landscape patterns, the implementation strategies of urban rewilding will be different, and landscape ecology is needed as a large-scale perspective of urban rewilding. 5) Community assembly theory. The research on urban rewilding needs to be refined and conducted from a small-scale perspective. Only through community assembly theory can the actual state of rewilding in urban habitats be described. 6) Community succession theory. Community succession theory is needed to predict the future state of rewilded urban sites. 7) Biodiversity theory. The loss of urban biodiversity is the main reason for conducting urban rewilding research, and protecting biodiversity is an important goal of urban rewilding. 8) Self-design and designer approach theory. The self-design and designer approach of ecosystems are topics in the field of restoration ecology. Both are valuable for urban rewilding. 9) Invasion ecology theory. Invasion ecology is an important basic theory of urban rewilding, and it is promising to play an important role in the mechanical research and practice of urban rewilding. 10) Landscape disturbance and resilience theory. Disturbance is a neutral concept in the ecological community. The type, frequency, and intensity of natural disturbances that the urban environment can accept determine the degree to which the urban environment is close to the natural wilderness. 11) Exposure ecology theory. Urban rewilding is to expose urban residents to an environment with increased wilderness and enhance the health and well-being of urban residents. Exposure ecology theory is related to the verification of the health benefits of urban rewilding. 12) Landscape preference theory. Due to visual characteristics such as messiness and disorder, urban residents’ landscape preferences for wild environments may influence their acceptance of urban rewilding. Therefore, the research and practice of urban rewilding require theoretical foundations across varies scales and across natural and social sciences. Urban rewilding research can refer to research ideas and methods in related fields, such as applying information technology in the field of rewilding, verifying the impact of microorganisms on human health in urban rewilding research, and exploring the impact of urban ecosystems from an evolutionary perspective. The biggest challenge in urban rewilding may not be the theory or practice itself, but the development of theories that can guide practice — this is also a problem faced by the theoretical fields of related disciplines. Breakthroughs in the integration of theory and practice require quantitative cross-disciplinary research that can address the needs of multiple spatial and temporal scales. It also requires researchers themselves to have sufficient theoretical innovation capabilities and project practice experience. It is noteworthy that excessive beautification of the concept of urban rewilding will hinder the development and practical application of the theoretical system of urban rewilding. Objective exploration of the positive and negative impacts of urban rewilding is recommended. The implementation of urban rewilding requires adhering to the golden mean in traditional Chinese culture and maintaining a delicate equilibrium. City, ecology, or urban nature is not inherently good or bad. Therefore, urban rewilding is not a panacea that can bring absolute prosperity and vitality to cities. It is just a new stage in the human history of continuous contradictory struggle and compromise with nature. The research and practice of urban rewilding entail long-term efforts. By sorting out the theoretical foundation for urban rewilding, the research lays the foundation for the establishment of the theoretical system of urban rewilding, and provides ideas for academic research and application practice in this field.
- urban rewilding,
- ecological restoration,
- landscape management,
- vegetation dynamics,
- biodiversity,
- sustainability

FullText(HTML)

References (79)

References

[1]	DURANT S M, PETTORELLI N, DU TOIT J T. The Future of Rewilding: Fostering Nature and People in a Changing World[M]//PETTORELLI N, DURANT S M, DU TOIT J T. Rewilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019: 413-425.
[2]	HU S, YUE H, ZHOU Z. Preferences for Urban Stream Landscapes: Opportunities to Promote Unmanaged Riparian Vegetation[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 38: 114-123.
[3]	朱建宁.在城市中营造野态环境的途径[J].中国园林,2008,24(8):50-54. ZHU J N. Approaches to Constructing Wild Environment in Cities[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2008, 24 (8): 50-54.
[4]	曹越,马丁,杨锐.城市野境:城市区域中野性自然的保护与营造[J].风景园林,2019,26(8):20-24. CAO Y, MARTIN V, YANG R. Urban Wildness: Protection and Creation of Wild Nature in Urban Areas[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26 (8): 20-24.
[5]	王向荣.城市荒野与城市生境[J].风景园林,2019,26(1):4-5. WANG X R. Urban Wilderness and Urban Habitat[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26 (1): 4-5.
[6]	ARONSON M F, LEPCZYK C A, EVANS K L, et al. Biodiversity in the City: Key Challenges for Urban Green Space Management[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2017, 15 (4): 189-196. doi: 10.1002/fee.1480
[7]	PERINO A, PEREIRA H M, NAVARRO L M, et al. Rewilding Complex Ecosystems[J]. Science, 2019, 364: eaav5570. doi: 10.1126/science.aav5570
[8]	PETTORELLI N, DURANT S M, DU TOIT J T. Rewilding: A Captivating, Controversial, Twenty-First Century Concept to Address Ecological Degradation in A Changing World[M]//PETTORELLI N, DURANT S M, DU TOIT J T. Rewilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019: 1-11.
[9]	罗明.英国“再野化”, 中国或可借鉴[N]. 中国自然资源报, 2019-07-16（003）. LUO M. Britain’s ‘Rewilding’ Could Be a Reference for China[N]. China Natural Resources News, 2019-07-16(003).
[10]	MALLER C, MUMAW L, AND COOKE B. Health and Social Benefits of Living with ‘Wild’ Nature[M]// PETTORELLI N, DURANT S M, DU TOIT J T. Rewilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019: 165-181.
[11]	CARVER S, CONVERY I, HAWKINS S, et al. Guiding Principles for Rewilding[J]. Conservation Biology, 2021, 35 (6): 1882-1893. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13730
[12]	曹越,杨锐.中国荒野研究框架与关键课题[J].中国园林,2017,33(6):10-15. CAO Y, YANG R. The Research Framework and Key Issues of Chinese Wilderness Studies[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2017, 33 (6): 10-15.
[13]	PRIOR J, BRADY E. Environmental Aesthetics and Rewilding[J]. Environmental Values, 2017, 26 (1): 31-51. doi: 10.3197/096327117X14809634978519
[14]	PETTORELLI N, SCHULTE TO BÜHNE H, CUNNINGHAM A A, et al. Rewilding Our Cities[R]. London: Zoological Society of London (ZSL), 2022.
[15]	CANTRELL B, MARTIN L J, ELLIS E C. Designing Autonomy: Opportunities for New Wildness in the Anthropocene[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 32 (3): 156-166.
[16]	HWANG Y H. Rewilding Urban Landscapes: Attributes, Types, and Application as a Greening Policy[M]//IAN DOUGLAS P M L, ANDERSON D G, HOUCK M C, et al. The Routledge Handbook of Urban Ecology. New York: Routledge, 2020: 762-772.
[17]	邵钰涵,徐欣瑜,袁嘉.城市荒野景观:内涵与价值审视[J].景观设计学,2021,9(1):14-25. doi: 10.15302/J-LAF-1-020039 SHAO Y H, XU X Y, YUAN J. The Intension and Values of Urban Wildscapes[J]. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2021, 9 (1): 14-25. doi: 10.15302/J-LAF-1-020039
[18]	张庆费.城市生态空间再野化及其实施途径探讨[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(6):10-14,40. ZHANG Q F. Urban Ecological Space Rewilding and Its Implementation Methods[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2022, 20 (6): 10-14,40.
[19]	MASOOD N, RUSSO A. Community Perception of Brownfield Regeneration Through Urban Rewilding[J]. Sustainability 2023, 15(4): 3842.
[20]	ELANDS B H M, VIERIKKO K, ANDERSSON E, et al. Biocultural Diversity: A Novel Concept to Assess Human-Nature Interrelations, Nature Conservation and Stewardship in Cities[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 40: 29-34.
[21]	王效科,苏跃波,任玉芬,等.城市生态系统:人与自然复合[J].生态学报,2020,40(15):5093-5102. WANG X K, SU Y B, REN Y F, et al. Urban Ecosystem: Human and Nature Compounding[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40 (15): 5093-5102.
[22]	MONBIOT G. Feral: Rewilding the Land, the Sea, and Human Life[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.
[23]	SARABI S, FRANTZESKAKI N, WALDENBERGER J, et al. Renaturing Cities: From Utopias to Contested Realities and Futures[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2023, 86: 127999.
[24]	JEPSON P, BLYTHE C. Rewilding: The Radical New Science of Ecological Recovery[M]. London: Icon Books, 2020.
[25]	李锋,马远.城市生态系统修复研究进展[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9144-9153. LI F, MA Y. Research Progress of Urban Ecosystem Restoration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41 (23): 9144-9153.
[26]	FORMAN R T. Urban Ecology: Science of Cities[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[27]	KOWARIK I. Urban Biodiversity, Ecosystems and the City: Insights from 50 Years of the Berlin School of Urban Ecology[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, 240: 104877. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104877
[28]	BERGIN M D, PEDERSEN R Ø, JENSEN M, et al. Mapping Rewilding Potential: A Systematic Approach to Prioritise Areas for Rewilding in Human-Dominated Regions[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2024, 77: 126536. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126536
[29]	HART E E, HAIGH A, CIUTI S. A Scoping Review of the Scientific Evidence Base for Rewilding in Europe[J]. Biological Conservation, 2023, 285: 110243. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110243
[30]	COHEN-SHACHAM E, WALTERS G, JANZEN C, et al. Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges[R]. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), 2016.
[31]	KEESSTRA S, NUNES J, NOVARA A, et al. The Superior Effect of Nature Based Solutions in Land Management for Enhancing Ecosystem Services[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 610: 997-1009.
[32]	LEHMANN S. Growing Biodiverse Urban Futures: Renaturalization and Rewilding as Strategies to Strengthen Urban Resilience[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13 (5): 2932. doi: 10.3390/su13052932
[33]	FAIVRE N, FRITZ M, FREITAS T, et al. Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with Nature to Address Social, Economic and Environmental Challenges[J]. Environmental Research, 2017, 159: 509-518. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032
[34]	FOLKARD-TAPP H, BANKS-LEITE C, CAVAN E L. Nature-Based Solutions to Tackle Climate Change and Restore Biodiversity[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 58 (11): 2344-2348. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.14059
[35]	BEATLEY T. Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2011.
[36]	MILLIKEN S, KOTZEN B, WALIMBE S, et al. Biophilic Cities and Health[J]. Cities & Health, 2023, 7 (2): 175-188.
[37]	MILLS J G, WEINSTEIN P, GELLIE N J C, et al. Urban Habitat Restoration Provides A Health Benefit through Microbiome Engineering: The Microbiome Rewilding Hypothesis[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2017, 25 (6): 866-872. doi: 10.1111/rec.12610
[38]	MILLS J G, BROOKES J D, GELLIE N J C, et al. Relating Urban Biodiversity to Human Health with the ‘Holobiont’ Concept[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10: 550. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00550
[39]	FISCHER L K, HONOLD J, CVEJIĆ R, et al. Beyond Green: Broad Support for Biodiversity in Multicultural European Cities[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2018, 49: 35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.001
[40]	OPDAHL E, DEMPS K, HEATH J A. Decreased Cortisol Among Hikers Who Preferentially Visit and Value Biodiverse Riparian Zones[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79822-w
[41]	DUNN R R, GAVIN M C, SANCHEZ M C, et al. The Pigeon Paradox: Dependence of Global Conservation on Urban Nature[J]. Conservation Biology, 2006, 20 (6): 1814-1816. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00533.x
[42]	柴永福,岳明.植物群落构建机制研究进展[J].生态学报,2016,36(15):4557-4572. CHAI Y F, YUE M. Research Advances in Plant Community Assembly Mechanisms[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36 (15): 4557-4572.
[43]	许驭丹,董世魁,李帅,等.植物群落构建的生态过滤机制研究进展[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2267-2281. XU Y D, DONG S K, LI S, et al. Research Progress on Ecological Filtering Mechanisms for Plant Community Assembly[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39 (7): 2267-2281.
[44]	VELLEND M. The Theory of Ecological Communities[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
[45]	CHANG C C, TURNER B L. Ecological Succession in a Changing World[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2019, 107 (2): 503-509. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13132
[46]	雷纳, 韦斯特.后荒野世界的植物种植: 为韧性景观设计植物群落[M].余洋, 胡尚春, 译.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2021. RAINER T, WEST C. Planting in A Post-Wild World: Designing Plant Communities for Resilient Landscapes[M]. YU Y, HU S C, translated. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2021.
[47]	OUDOLF P, DARKE R. Gardens of the High Line[M]. Portland: Timber Press, 2017.
[48]	ODUM H T. Ecological Engineering and Self-Organization[M]//MITSCH W J, JØRGENSEN S E. Ecological Engineering: An Introduction to Ecotechnology. New York: Wiley, 1989: 79-101.
[49]	MITSCH W J, WILSON R F. Improving the Success of Wetland Creation and Restoration with Know-How, Time, and Self-Design[J]. Ecological Applications, 1996, 6 (1): 77-83. doi: 10.2307/2269554
[50]	MITSCH W J, WU X, NAIRN R W, et al. Creating and Restoring Wetlands[J]. BioScience, 1998, 48 (12): 1019-1030. doi: 10.2307/1313458
[51]	任海,彭少麟,陆宏芳.退化生态系统恢复与恢复生态学[J].生态学报,2004,24(8):1756-1764. REN H, PENG S L, LU H F. The Restoration of Degraded Ecosystems and Restoration Ecology[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24 (8): 1756-1764.
[52]	YU Z, YANG G, LIN T, et al. Exposure Ecology Drives a Unified Understanding of the Nexus of (Urban) Natural Ecosystem, Ecological Exposure, and Health[J]. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2024, 10: 0165. doi: 10.34133/ehs.0165
[53]	BRATMAN G N, OLVERA-ALVAREZ H A, GROSS J J. The Affective Benefits of Nature Exposure[J]. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2021, 15 (8): e12630. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12630
[54]	JIMENEZ M P, DEVILLE N V, ELLIOTT E G, et al. Associations Between Nature Exposure and Health: A Review of the Evidence[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18 (9): 4790. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094790
[55]	YAO X H, YU Z W, MA W Y, et al. Quantifying Threshold Effects of Physiological Health Benefits in Greenspace Exposure[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2024, 241: 104917. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104917
[56]	LAI H, FLIES E J, WEINSTEIN P, et al. The Impact of Green Space and Biodiversity on Health[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2019, 17 (7): 383-390. doi: 10.1002/fee.2077
[57]	ROOK G A. Regulation of the Immune System by Biodiversity from the Natural Environment: An Ecosystem Service Essential to Health[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110 (46): 18360-18367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313731110
[58]	朱永官,王兰,卢昌熠,等.“同一健康”框架下的城市环境微生物及其优化设计[J].风景园林,2023,30(12):22-26. doi: 10.12409/j.fjyl.202305290249 ZHU Y G, WANG L, LU C Y, et al. Urban Environmental Microbes and Their Optimal Design Under the “One Health” Framework[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30 (12): 22-26. doi: 10.12409/j.fjyl.202305290249
[59]	ELTON C S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants[M]. Cham: Springer Nature, 2020.
[60]	CAVIERES L A. Facilitation and the Invasibility of Plant Communities[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109 (5): 2019-2028. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13627
[61]	TRAVESET A, RICHARDSON D M. Mutualisms: Key Drivers of Invasions ... Key Casualties of Invasions[M]// RICHARDSON D M. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011: 143-160.
[62]	KOWARIK I. Urban Wilderness: Supply, Demand, and Access[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 29: 336-347.
[63]	HU S, HANSEN G, MONAGHAN P. Optimizing Shoreline Planting Design for Urban Residential Stormwater Systems: Aligning Visual Quality and Environmental Functions[J]. Horttechnology, 2017, 27: 310-318. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH03580-16
[64]	杨锐,曹越.“再野化”:山水林田湖草生态保护修复的新思路[J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8763-8770. YANG R, CAO Y. Rewilding: New Ideas for Ecological Protection and Restoration Projects of Mountains-Rivers-Forests-Farmlands-Lakes-Grasslands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39 (23): 8763-8770.
[65]	米湘成,王绪高,沈国春,等.中国森林生物多样性监测网络:二十年群落构建机制探索的回顾与展望[J].生物多样性,2022,30(10):207-229. MI X C, WANG X G, SHEN G C, et al. Chinese Forest Biodiversity Monitoring Network (CForBio): Twenty Years of Exploring Community Assembly Mechanisms and Prospects for Future Research[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2022, 30 (10): 207-229.
[66]	REJMÁNEK M, RICHARDSON DM, PYŠEK P. Plant Invasions and Invasibility of Plant Communities[M]// MAAREL E V, FRANKLIN J. Vegetation Ecology. Malden: Wiley, 2005: 332-355.
[67]	FRIDLEY J D, STACHOWICZ J J, NAEEM S, et al. The Invasion Paradox: Reconciling Pattern and Process in Species Invasions[J]. Ecology, 2007, 88 (1): 3-17. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[3:TIPRPA]2.0.CO;2
[68]	GIORIA M, HULME P E, RICHARDSON D M, et al. Why Are Invasive Plants Successful?[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2023, 74: 635-670. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-070522-071021
[69]	Greater London Authority. Rewilding London: Final Report of the London Rewilding Taskforce[R]. London: Greater London Authority, 2023.
[70]	钱蕾西,王晞月,王向荣.城市自然的再认知:典型城市荒野空间的识别特征及应对策略[J].中国园林,2022,38(8):16-23. QIAN L X, WANG X Y, WANG X R. Recognition of Urban Nature: Identification Features and Coping Strategies of Typical Urban Wilderness Spaces[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2022, 38 (8): 16-23.
[71]	袁嘉,欧桦杰,金晓东,等.城市荒野生态研究概述[J].生态学报,2023,43(4):1703-1713. YUAN J, OU H J, JIN X D, et al. An Overview of Urban Wildness Ecological Research[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43 (4): 1703-1713.
[72]	WEBB J, MOXON S. A Study Protocol to Understand Urban Rewilding Behaviour in Relation to Adaptations to Private Gardens[J]. Cities & Health, 2023, 7 (2): 273-281.
[73]	MATA L, RAMALHO C E, KENNEDY J, et al. Bringing Nature Back into Cities[J]. People and Nature, 2020, 2 (2): 350-368. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10088
[74]	全璨璨,张红梅,高淑滢.江洋畈生态公园次生植被群落分类与演替研究[J].安徽农业科学,2022,50(4):110-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2022.04.029 QUAN C C, ZHANG H M, GAO S Y. Study on the Secondary Vegetation Community Classification and Success in Jiangyangfan Ecological Park[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50 (4): 110-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2022.04.029
[75]	FOXCROFT L C, PYŠEK P, RICHARDSON D M, et al. The Bottom Line: Impacts of Alien Plant Invasions in Protected Areas[M]//FOXCROFT L C, PYŠEK P, RICHARDSON D M, GENOVESI P. Plant Invasions in Protected Areas. Cham: Springer, 2013: 19-41.
[76]	CHENEY C, VAN WILGEN N J, ESLER K J, et al. Quantifying Range Structure to Inform Management in Invaded Landscapes[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 58 (2): 338-349. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13765
[77]	PIANA P, BROCADA L, HEARN R, et al. Urban Rewilding: Human-Wildlife Relations in Genoa, NW Italy[J]. Cities, 2024, 144: 104660. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104660
[78]	SOULSBURY C D, WHITE P C L. Human−Wildlife Interactions in Urban Areas: A Review of Conflicts, Benefits and Opportunities[J]. Wildlife Research, 2015, 42 (7): 541-553. doi: 10.1071/WR14229
[79]	SCHELL C J, STANTON L A, YOUNG J K, et al. The Evolutionary Consequences of Human−Wildlife Conflict in Cities[J]. Evolutionary Applications, 2021, 14 (1): 178-197. doi: 10.1111/eva.13131