Citation: | YU Qiao, LI Haochen, DU Mengjiao, QIAN Yun. Characteristic Difference and Collaborative Planning of Regional River Blue-Green Space[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30(1): 78-84. DOI: 10.12409/j.fjyl.202202270117 |
Passing through nature reserves, rural agricultural areas and urban construction areas successively, regional river blue-green space is typically characterized by external differentiation and internal integrity. With its natural process and spatial function closely linked, regional river blue-green space plays the role of multi-scale support constraint and multi-dimensional regional coordination in territorial spatial planning. As an important ecologically sensitive space, regional river blue-green corridor network can support the supply of territorial natural ecological resources as a whole, the protection and restoration of ecological space, the efficiency of rainfall flood regulation and storage, the health of ecosystem in urban and rural watersheds, and can constrain the unlimited sprawl of city and the planning and spatial layout of construction land to guide the formation of sustainable urban spatial forms and promote the intensive development of territorial space. The river blue-green space has multiple functional values in such fields as ecology, society, economy and culture. Through reasonable planning and management, the river blue-green space can be used as a "connector" to coordinate the conflicts between protected areas and development areas, construction land and non-construction land, ecological function and social function, etc. The research on the collaborative planning of river blue-green space is of important significance to the conservation and exploitation of natural resources under the background of territorial spatial planning.
Through literature research and case studies, this research summarizes the differences in the transformation characteristics of regional river blue-green space, and develops approaches for the collaborative planning and management thereof.
The differences in internal natural characteristics are reflected in longitudinal spaces (such as source zone, transfer zone and sedimentary zone), lateral spaces (such as river channel, flood plain, slope area and highland area), vertical spaces (such as surface water, diving layer and groundwater) and seasonal changes of natural factors. The differences in external construction demands are reflected in the riparian areas associated with urban and rural areas, such as nature reserves, rural agricultural areas, and urban construction areas, which respectively undertake such functions as habitat maintenance, agricultural production, residence, industry, commerce and leisure. The differences in regional overall spatial transformation are reflected in the transformation rules for river blue-green space in such aspects as functional pattern, associated land utilization, and basic element characteristics. On the basis of recognizing the characteristic differences of regional river blue-green space, the research proposes a collaborative planning approach in terms of space and function. According to relevant socio-economic indicators, the research conducts transect zoning at three levels as follows: the overall transect zoning of the river network at the urban and rural regional level, the river longitudinal transect zoning at the central town level, and the lateral transect zoning of river reach at the block site level. In combination with the natural ecological characteristics, current construction problems and urban-rural development demands of the river blue-green space in each zone, the research coordinates the dominant and secondary composite functions of the river blue-green space in transect zones as a whole and the longitudinal transect zones based on the interpretation of the synergy-tradeoff relationship between various ecological service functions. At the level of urban and rural areas, the research puts forward a model for collaborative planning and layout of river blue-green space at multiple scales. In addition, the research builds an overall support system of river blue-green space, which covers water conservation areas, hydrological corridors, and hydrological priorities. According to the overall functional positioning of the overall transect zoning, the research confirms the layout types and locations of conservation areas, corridors and hydrological priorities. At the level of central town, the research forms the longitudinal land layout pattern of the river blue-green space. Under the composite functional objective of longitudinal transect zoning, the research summarizes the guidelines for the layout of land types of the river blue-green space in such aspects as layout location, layout scale, layout form and compatible combination to form a coupled and coordinated layout mode for construction land and non-built land in river area of central town. At the level of block site, the research implements management and control over the lateral ecological interface of the river blue-green space and the fine interface design matching the composite functional objectives. Specifically, the research manages and controls the boundary, patch form and greenway of the ecological interface, and establishes the main control indicators of the lateral ecological interface, such as the proportion of trees and shrubs, the form of revetment, the ratio of inner patch edge, and the width of greenway and green street.
There exists obvious spatial heterogeneity in the supply and demand of ecosystem services in the regional river blue-green space. It is necessary to integrate the differences in ecological characteristics and social demands, and carry out the identification of differences in urban-rural regional characteristics and the collaborative planning and management of regional river blue-green space. Based on transect zoning, the research clarifies the the composite functions of and the spatial layout of land utilization by river blue-green space, and develops the strategies for collaborative planning at different levels for different river sections and corresponding control factor indexes, so as to form planning and management approaches for the effective protection and utilization of regional river blue-green space. The collaborative planning of regional river blue-green space attaches importance to both the internal adaptation to the evolution of riparian ecosystem, and the external formation of related environmental impacts and satisfaction of urban-rural development function demands, which not only ensures the healthy operation of the internal ecosystem of the river corridor, but also improves the external composite service function.
[1] |
YU Q, XING Z, ZHOU Q F, et al. Mapping Supply-Demand of Riparian Ecosystem Service for Riparian Greenspace Planning at Multiple Spatial Scales[J]. China City Planning Review, 2020, 29(4): 6-17.
|
[2] |
余俏. 山地城市河岸绿色空间规划研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2019.
YU Q. Research on Riparian Green Space Planning of Mountainous City[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2019.
|
[3] |
陈竞姝. 韧性城市理论下河流蓝绿空间融合策略研究[J]. 规划师, 2020, 36(14): 5-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHSI202014001.htm
CHEN J S. Spatial Planning Strategies of Blue and Green River Space Integration from Urban Resilience Viewpoint[J]. Planners, 2020, 36(14): 5-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHSI202014001.htm
|
[4] |
王世福, 刘联璧. 从廊道到全域: 绿色城市设计引领下的城乡蓝绿空间网络构建[J]. 风景园林, 2021, 28(8): 45-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL202108005.htm
WANG S F, LIU L B. From Corridor to Whole Region: Construction of Urban and Rural Blue-Green Space Network Under the Guidance of Green Urban Design[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(8): 45-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL202108005.htm
|
[5] |
黄铎, 易芳蓉, 汪思哲, 等. 国土空间规划中蓝绿空间模式与指标体系研究[J]. 城市规划, 2022, 46(1): 18-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH202201002.htm
HUANG D, YI F R, WANG S Z, et al. Blue-Green Space Pattern and Indicator System in Territorial Planning[J]. City Planning Review, 2022, 46(1): 18-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH202201002.htm
|
[6] |
刘文平, 宋子亮, 李岩, 等. 基于自然的解决方案的流域生态修复路径: 以长江经济带为例[J]. 风景园林, 2021, 28(12): 23-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL202112003.htm
LIU W P, SONG Z L, LI Y, et al. Application of Nature-Based Solutions in Ecological Restoration of Watershed: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(12): 23-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL202112003.htm
|
[7] |
禹佳宁, 周燕, 王雪原, 等. 城市蓝绿景观格局对雨洪调蓄功能的影响[J]. 风景园林, 2021, 28(9): 63-67. doi: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.09.0063.05
YU J N, ZHOU Y, WANG X Y, et al. Influence of Urban Blue-Green Landscape Pattern on Rainfall-Flood Regulation and Storage Function[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021, 28(9): 63-67. doi: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.09.0063.05
|
[8] |
张浪, 李晓策, 刘杰, 等. 基于国土空间规划的城市生态网络体系构建研究[J]. 现代城市研究, 2021, 36(5): 97-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDCS202105017.htm
ZHANG L, LI X C, LIU J, et al. Research on the Construction of Urban Ecological Network System Based on Territorial Spatial Planning[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2021, 36(5): 97-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDCS202105017.htm
|
[9] |
吴岩, 贺旭生, 杨玲. 国土空间规划体系背景下市县级蓝绿空间系统专项规划的编制构想[J]. 风景园林, 2020, 27(1): 30-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL202001006.htm
WU Y, HE X S, YANG L. Compilation Conception of City and County Level Blue-Green Space System Specialized Planning Under National Territory Spatial Planning System[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2020, 27(1): 30-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL202001006.htm
|
[10] |
李晓鹏, 张思凝, 冯黎, 等. 成都城区河流廊道自生植物的生境及物种多样性[J]. 风景园林, 2022, 29(1): 64-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL202201008.htm
LI X P, ZHANG S N, FENG L, et al. Habitat and Species Diversity of Spontaneous Plants on Both Sides of River Corridor in Chengdu Urban Area[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(1): 64-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL202201008.htm
|
[11] |
袁奇峰, 谭诗敏, 李刚, 等. 空间规划: 为何?何为?何去?[J]. 规划师, 2018, 34(7): 11-17, 25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHSI201807003.htm
YUAN Q F, TAN S M, LI G, et al. Objectives, Functions, and Orientation of Spatial Planning[J]. Planners, 2018, 34(7): 11-17, 25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHSI201807003.htm
|
[12] |
邢忠, 余俏, 顾媛媛, 等. 基于城乡样条分区的绿色空间规划方法研究[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43 (4): 24-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH201904005.htm
XING Z, YU Q, GU Y Y, et al. Research on Green Space Planning Methods Based on Urban-Rural Transect Zoning[J]. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(4): 24-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH201904005.htm
|
[13] |
王启轩, 任婕. 我国流域国土空间规划制度构建的若干探讨: 基于国际经验的启示[J]. 城市规划, 2021, 45 (2): 65-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH202102009.htm
WANG Q X, REN J. On the Institutional Construction for Territorial Planning of China's River Basin: The Enlightenment from International Experience[J]. City Planning Review, 2021, 45 (2): 65-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSGH202102009.htm
|
[14] |
WARD J V. The Four-Dimensional Nature of Lotic Ecosystems[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 1989, 8(1): 2-8.
|
[15] |
MCDONNELL M J, PICKETT S T A. Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas[M]. New York: Springer, 1993.
|
[16] |
ROBERT C, PETERSEN J. The RCE: A Riparian, Channel, and Environmental Inventory for Small Streams in the Agricultural Landscape[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1992, 27(2): 295-306.
|
[17] |
YU Q, DU M J, LI H C, et al. Research on the Integrated Planning of Blue-Green Space Towards Urban-Rural Resilience: Conceptual Framework and Practicable Approach[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022, 13(3): 347-359.
|
[18] |
BERG H E, BENDOR T K. A Case Study of Form-Based Solutions for Watershed Protection[J]. Environmental Management, 2010, 46(3): 436-451.
|
[19] |
ZHOU T, REN W, PENG S, et al. A Riverscape Transect Approach to Studying and Restoring River Systems: A Case Study from Southern China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 65: 147-158.
|
[20] |
ABUNNASR Y, HAMIN E M. The Green Infrastructure Transect: An Organizational Framework for Mainstreaming Adaptation Planning Policies[C]//OTTO-ZIMMERMANN K. Resilient Cities 2: Cities and Adaptation to Climate Change Proceedings of the Global Forum 2011. New York: Springer, 2012.
|
[21] |
刘世斌. 流域土地利用功能分区体系研究: 以梁子湖流域为例[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2013.
LIU S B. Research on the System of Watershed Land Use Function Zoning: A Case Study of Liangzi Lake Watershed[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2013.
|
[22] |
贺金, 李晓雷, 魏辰. 基于流域尺度的功能区划方法在永定河治理的应用[J]. 水利水电工程设计, 2021, 40(3): 53-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSG202103019.htm
HE J, LI X L, WEI C. Application of Functional Zoning Method Based on Watershed Scale in Yongding River Regulation[J]. Design of Water Resources & Hydroelectric Engineering, 2021, 40(3): 53-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSG202103019.htm
|
[23] |
强盼盼. 河流廊道规划理论与应用研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2011.
QIANG P P. Research on River Corridor Planning Theory and Application[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2011.
|
[24] |
CHEN C D, MEURK C D, CHENG H, et al. Incorporating Local Ecological Knowledge into Urban Riparian Restoration in a Mountainous Region of Southwest China[J]. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2016, 20(1): 140-151.
|
[25] |
LOVISA L, MAHER H, HJALMAR L. Towards Ecologically Functional Riparian Zones: A Meta-Analysis to Develop Guidelines for Protecting Ecosystem Functions and Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 249(1): 109391.
|
[26] |
BENNETT E M, PETERSON G D, GORDON L J. Understanding Relationships Among Multiple Ecosystem Services[J]. Ecology Letters, 2010, 12(12): 1394-1404.
|
[27] |
颜文涛, 黄欣, 邹锦. 融合生态系统服务的城乡土地利用规划: 概念框架与实施途径[J]. 风景园林, 2017, 24(1): 45-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL201701008.htm
YAN W T, HUANG X, ZOU J. Ecosystem Services Integrated Urban and Rural Land Use Planning: Conceptua Framework and Practical Approach[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2017, 24(1): 45-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYL201701008.htm
|
[28] |
BARTON D N, SUNDT H, BUSTOS A A, et al. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Bayesian Networks-Diagnosing Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs in a Hydropower Regulated River[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2020, 124: 104604.
|
[29] |
邢忠, 余俏, 周茜, 等. 中心城区E类用地中的廊道空间生态规划方法[J]. 规划师, 2017, 33(4): 18-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHSI201704002.htm
XING Z, YU Q, ZHOU Q, et al. E Land Corridor Planning[J]. Planners, 2017, 33(4): 18-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHSI201704002.htm
|
[30] |
王红梅, 王堃. 景观生态界面边界判定与动态模拟研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2017(17): 5905-5914. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201717034.htm
WANG H M, WANG K. A Review of Edge Detection and Dynamic Modeling of Ecological Boundaries[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017(17): 5905-5914. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201717034.htm
|
1. |
高圣元. 文旅融合背景下瓯江诗路文化带蓝绿空间规划设计——以丽水滨江水岸走廊为例. 黑河学院学报. 2024(05): 58-60+72 .
![]() | |
2. |
赵炜,杨睿,王倩娜. 丘陵城市蓝绿空间多尺度协同规划技术路径与方法——以资阳市为例. 西部人居环境学刊. 2023(04): 31-39 .
![]() |